17

Direct Action —Direct Action

What Is Strategy?

In the world of business and marketing, “strategy” is frequently used, yet rarely useful. For all of our strategy statements, strategic roadmaps, corporate strategies, launch strategies, innovation strategies, and on and on and on, the ideas that we label as strategy fail to affect meaningful change.

The problem is not that strategy as a concept fails us, but rather that we don’t really understand what strategy is.

As a student of strategy, I’m trying to figure out what strategy means to me, and how I practice it in my work. My hope is that by being able to explain it (or at least understand it clearly myself), I will be better able to develop strategies for others that are clear, insightful, and effective. I want to become a master at creating strategies that inspire action.

Here’s where I’m starting…

Strategy is the practice of figuring out the best way to get from here to there.

Imagine that you are standing on one side of a body of water and you want to get to the other side. If the body of water is a puddle on the sidewalk you’d probably choose to hop over it. If it’s a small lake, you may choose to hop in a canoe and paddle your way across, or maybe if it’s a warm summer day, and you’re 16-time Olympic medalist Michael Phelps then you might choose to swim across. If you are standing on the California shore of the Pacific Ocean, and thinking about how to get to Japan, you might consider some sort of mechanized assistance.

In all of these examples, there are several key aspects that are fundamental to all forms of strategy. There’s 1) an understanding of where you are now, 2) a clear sense of where you want to end up, 3) an assessment of what stands in between, 4) a decision about how to approach the challenge, and 5) a specific course of action to undertake.

(Click for full-size version)

 

Developing a good strategy, one that really propels you forward and, as Sun Tzu, master of the Art of War would admire, enables you to win without even fighting, isn’t easy. There are a lot of questions to answer. And in an age where our problems are increasingly digital in nature, the questions become dauntingly complex very quickly. Creating successful strategies requires rigor, homework, effort, hard thinking, assessment, and analysis. It’s hard work.

Strategy is the practice of figuring out the best way to get from here to there.

It’s easy to understand why we let each other get away with substituting a cheap imitation for the real thing.

In his excellent book Good Strategy Bad Strategy (I highly recommend!), Richard Rumelt identifies these common strategy FAILs.

    • Fluff: Fluff is a form of gibberish masquerading as strategic concepts and arguments.
    • Failure to face the challenge: When you cannnot define the challenge, you cannot evaluate a strategy or improve it.
    • Mistaking goals for strategy: Many bad strategies are just statements of desire rather than plans for overcoming obstacles.
    • Bad strategic objectives: Strategic objectives are “bad” when they fail to address critical issues or when they are impracticable.

Sound familiar?

If your strategy doesn’t address these aspects of the challenge at hand in some way – 1) where you are now, 2) where you want to end up, 3) what stands in between, 4) a chosen approach, and 5) a specific course of action – then you don’t really have a strategy.

I’m on a mission to conquer bad strategy wherever I see it. Who’s with me?

  • http://twitter.com/marekting Marek Wolski

    I’m with you!

  • http://twitter.com/Ovurmind Viktor Ovurmind

    I would like paraphrase Shakespeare in terms of conquering bad strategy,
    “there is no good or bad strategy but strategic thinking makes it so”.

    [v.o.M.]

  • Pingback: Quora

  • Diane Clement76

    I am with you … and I like the read.  I am reminded of the quote, ”In preparing for battle, I have always found that plans are useless, but planning is indispensable.”
    –General Dwight D. Eisenhower.  Let’s use life & battle interchangeably.  I propose something here.  What stands in-between is often our own blind spot.  Not knowing what we don’t know/see.  Because of this, we cater to “obstacles” that are right under our nose, and often ignore the periphery.  That’s all I got right now.  I am working on #2 and I “want to end up” in an apartment soon.  Cheers.
     

  • http://twitter.com/ThePunkRockShop Tom Donald

    Great post mate.

  • Shahzar Zadran

    I am totally with you, hope you more successes

  • crycepaul

    Good read. So it’s solving problems eh?

  • Jeff Reckseidler

    Really sharp.

    AND highlights the distinct difference between planning and strategy in ad agencies right now. Digital strategists come in with experience in processes like the above, and are especially good at #’s 4 and 5.

    In a traditional ad agency creative is supposed to do 4 and 5. And that causes all sorts of confusion from planner, to strategist, to creative.

  • http://twitter.com/lisaskim lisa kim

    totally agree with your definition of strategy. too often it feels like everyone jumps straight to #4 and #5 but with little or no connection to #2 – which is of no use to anyone really in the long run.

    am reminded of something i believe einstein once said (forgive me if i butcher the quote!) about how if he had only 1 hour left to save the world, he’d spend 55 minutes defining the problem and 5 minutes solving it. we all need to do the hard work of defining a clear, concise and informed plan for how to solve a problem before we start reaching for the shiny bells & whistles.

  • Torbjörn Briggert

    Your mission is clear and important. count on me!

  • Per

    Thanks for a good post.
    I would like to add “who you are” into the equation also. Event though this one shines through the rest in some bits, I still believe it’s a valuable dimension to consider.

  • Andres Salazar

    Great post!

  • http://twitter.com/alexbgreen Alex Green

    There is a particular ownness on digital strategists to address what stands in between. In other fields where the market is more mature; history and competitors more clearly define what stands between you and your goal.

    Nice post, Mike.

  • http://www.sjbain.com/ SJBain

    Great post!

  • Nick Strada

    I like this. But I wonder if point 5 – a specific course of action – is actually where strategy ends and creative begins…at least until strategy is applied as a filter/evaluation tool.

  • http://twitter.com/darbtx Brad McCormick

    Love this post. But having a good strategy is only half the answer. Working one’s ass off is the second part.

  • a.

    i find that 3) what stands in-between, is what’s most frequently avoided, ignored, or not fully addressed. because what most often stands in-between is the organization itself – its current processes/methods/ –> culture, really, that will need to change in order for a change in strategy to truly take hold. and that level of self-reflection is quite difficult for most people, let alone for most organizations, to undertake.

Back to top
Mike Arauz online
What we're consuming
red-licorice Street Tucker

Catalog of food found on the streets of NYC. +1 for use of the word "Tucker."

Patriots Back to work wear

Amerika (courtesy John Winterkorn)

2000 years? Off the Grid

Eric Valli spent 3 years photographing people who 'live light on the earth'.

View all